Wednesday, October 26, 2016
Diana Eck: India: A Sacred Geography—Writing at the Intersection of Anthropology and Religion
![]() |
| Lotus; courtesy of Creative Commons |
India: A Sacred
Geography is a rich treat. A book
that has been gestating in its author for many, many years. This long process of production started with
her earliest work on Benaras (her dissertation I would presume), and includes
many years of visiting India, going to numerous places of pilgrimage, and
thinking about landscape, architecture, literature, language—how it all fits
together.
The underlying premise is that India was India long before
the latest colonial invasions. India
created itself by foot and pilgrimage, endowing the landscape with a sense of
meaning and story that is re-enacted again and again by the constant visiting
that crosses various territories. More
powerful than any boundary drawn by British or other parties, India’s sense of
consolidation is written on the landscape through the circulation of
pilgrims.
“Many Indian scholars have noted the significance of the network of pilgrimage places in constructing a sense of Indian “nationhood” not as a nation-state in the modern usage of the term, but as a shared, living landscape, with all this cultural and regional complexity,” says Eck (location 365)A landscape that is created in this way is mythic, historical, and contemporary. It is both natural and contrived. Of the natural—rivers play a huge role, of which there are many, many crossing the geography of the country. Of the contrived, temples, buildings, and cities are significant. Tirthas, dhams, lingas—I began to lose count of the many kinds of constructions that could be linked to weave together this landscape.
The anthropologic piece, for me, is the way Eck understands
this landscape of vast proportions from a kind of participant-observation
perspective. She has walked the ways of
the pilgrims…and yet she has also read and constructed a theoretical
understanding of the ways goddess bodies are distributed across landscape, the
way cities are connected through myth and pilgrimage, and the role that rivers
play throughout it all.
Studying the Indian sense of India as constructed through a religious
landscape that has been evolving for centuries is a different kind of
anthropologic feat than sitting in “x” village for a year and trying to figure
out water rights (although there is nothing wrong with that). And I am not at all sure that Eck would
describe herself as an anthropologist.
But there is something here that is highly anthropologic and deserves to
be thought about as a form of qualitative research. As such it provides insights about how to
study things that seem irregular, large, diffuse—not a village, school, or
business department. We need, I think,
to make use of qualitative research tools to study the irregular as well as the
regular and confined (made strange). I
would assume she has some items that count for traditional data, but I would
also assume that much of her thinking is not data-driven in the traditional way
we are using it right now—time bound and scientific—but incorporated in
embodied memories of visits and time spent watching and thinking. I think her method required lived experience,
and, as she says, it was gestating for a long time.
As I page through my digitally highlighted notes of the book
it’s hard to know what to stop and share—there is so much that I felt was
significant. It is definitely a good
read for a qualitative researcher in search of new models.
Labels:
anthropology,
Book review,
Eck,
India,
Qualitative Research,
religion
Wednesday, October 19, 2016
Making Sense of Obrist and Ways of Curating
Hans Ulrich Obrist’s book, Ways of Curating, is a marvel for
many reasons. He is so widely read and
so deeply intertwined with artists and curators through his decades long
interviewing activities that he is able to make amazing connections between the
history of curation and the current trends.
There are many lessons and overlap with qualitative research.
Below is a curated collection of quotations drawn from my
highlights in the Obrist text. Taken
from various parts of the text, they began to form a new narrative about the
bringing together of the arts and science, which was one, but certainly not the
whole of Obrist’s discussions.
As he has done in many sphere’s, Obrist suggests ways of
creating connections, making sparks fly through juxtapositions, miming, and
reorganization. My question to the world
of qualitative research is: How might we
change the way we bring things together—people, ideas, conferences—to “allow
different elements to touch”? What would
happen if we did?
Page
1 · Location 33
There
is a fundamental similarity to the act of curating, which at its most basic is
simply about connecting cultures, bringing their elements into proximity with
each other –the task of curating is to make junctions, to allow different
elements to touch. You might describe it as the attempted pollination of
culture, or a form of map-making that opens new routes through a city, a people
or a world.
Page
20 · Location 264
Zones
of contact was my working phrase for what Boltanski, Lavier and I were trying
to create. I took it from the anthropologist James Clifford, who had written
about a new model for ethnographic museums, in which the peoples whose culture
was being ‘represented’ by the museum proposed their own alternate forms of
exhibiting and collecting. They were taking it upon themselves to recollect
their own story and create their history from the inside. This changed the
whole historical narrative of the ethnographic museum, which has mostly been a
place for one culture to tell the story of another.
Page
23 · Location 305
The
current vogue for the idea of curating stems from a feature of modern life that
is impossible to ignore: the proliferation and reproduction of ideas, raw data,
processed information, images, disciplinary knowledge and material products that
we are witnessing today.
Collecting
Knowledge
Highlight(orange) - Page 39 · Location
526
Though
the aim of amassing evidence may sound like a rather scientific way to think
about collecting, it is necessary to remember that the hard distinction between
science and art which marks more recent centuries was not evident as late as
the sixteenth century. The separation of art and the humanities on the one
hand, and science on the other, is a fundamental feature of modern life, but it
also constitutes a loss.
Highlight(orange) - Page 40 · Location
534
To
study the Renaissance is to gain a model for reconnecting art and science,
sundered by history.
Curating
(Non-)Conferences
Highlight(yellow) - Page 152 · Location
1921
Having
suddenly been introduced to such an interdisciplinary mixture of people was
like a revelation to me. So I thought more about how to connect the arts and
the sciences within my own curatorial work.
Highlight(yellow) - Page 153 · Location
1932
So
I thought it would be interesting to apply the idea of changing the rules of
the game for a discursive event like a conference, similar to what I had done
in exhibitions. A mischievous idea occurred to me. What if one had all the
accoutrements of a conference: the schedule, hotel accommodation, participants
with their badges, but dispensed with the ‘official’ elements of panels,
Highlight(yellow) - Page 153 · Location
1937
The
idea was to create a contact zone where something could happen but nothing had
to happen. And so the ‘conference’ we organized at the research centre, ‘Art
and Brain’, had all the constituents of a colloquium except the colloquium.
There were coffee breaks, a bus trip, meals, tours of the facilities, but no
colloquium.
Highlight(yellow) - Page 154 · Location
1943
the
role of the curator is to create free space, not occupy existing space. In my
practice, the curator has to bridge gaps and build bridges between artists, the
public, institutions and other types of communities. The crux of this work is
to build temporary communities, by connecting different people and practices,
and creating the conditions for triggering sparks between them.
Wednesday, October 12, 2016
Sharlene Hesse-Biber Does It Again! The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research
I consider Sharlene Hesse-Biber to be the absolute queen of handbooks about qualitative research (and related subjects). When some people get to the "handbook stage" of their career, the reading gets dull. But this is not the case with Dr. Hesse-Biber. Recently I found myself sitting at a desk with multiple handbooks assembled by Hesse-Biber...and they were all good and worthwhile! Her latest volume is not a disappointment.
I selected a couple of articles from it for my "Advanced Topics in Qualitative Research" course for this fall. I wanted to provide students with cutting edge topics in qualitative research, and mixed methods definitely counts as one of those. The two we reviewed were:
"Introduction: Navigating a Turbulent Research Landscape: Working the Boundaries, Tensions, Diversity, and Contradictions of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Inquiry" by Sharlene Hesse-Biber
and
"A Qualitatively Driven Approach to Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research" by Sharlene Hesse-Biber, Deborah Rodriguez, and Nollaig Frost.
I was particularly pleased to see interdisciplinary and team research issues discussed at length in Hesse-Biber's introduction. This emphasis is contrary to what one sees in the majority of textbooks on qualitative research up to now, which describe research methodology as primarily an act performed by individuals. The inclusion of these issues here illustrates the way Hesse-Biber stays current with developments in research.
She does not shy away from the difficulties present in trying to mix methodological approaches.
In thinking about these issues, the case studies included were invaluable. There are three. The first about rape culture. The second about enhancing the validity of clinical trials with Asian-American patients. The third case study took up gender inequality in the workplace.
Throughout the chapter, the authors used simple visuals (squares inside of or relationship to other squares)--so simple, but very effective.
I appreciated the caveats or cautions the authors offered. Here is one that stood out:
The full reference is:
Hesse-Biber, S. & Burke Johnson, R. (Eds.) (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry. Oxford University Press.
I selected a couple of articles from it for my "Advanced Topics in Qualitative Research" course for this fall. I wanted to provide students with cutting edge topics in qualitative research, and mixed methods definitely counts as one of those. The two we reviewed were:
"Introduction: Navigating a Turbulent Research Landscape: Working the Boundaries, Tensions, Diversity, and Contradictions of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Inquiry" by Sharlene Hesse-Biber
and
"A Qualitatively Driven Approach to Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research" by Sharlene Hesse-Biber, Deborah Rodriguez, and Nollaig Frost.
I was particularly pleased to see interdisciplinary and team research issues discussed at length in Hesse-Biber's introduction. This emphasis is contrary to what one sees in the majority of textbooks on qualitative research up to now, which describe research methodology as primarily an act performed by individuals. The inclusion of these issues here illustrates the way Hesse-Biber stays current with developments in research.
She does not shy away from the difficulties present in trying to mix methodological approaches.
Important in fostering a robust mixed methods analytical and interpretative process as well is the development of a profound appreciation for the potential contributions a given methodological perspective can bring to a mixed methods project. (xli)Border tensions thread throughout the Introduction from the qual/quant divide to disciplinary differences to the colonial divide of the global North and South, to technology divides. Not surprisingly Hesse-Biber is also the editor of the excellent "Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research." She speaks with authority when she says:
The notion of multiple data sets and structure levels was part of the class conversation about the second article as we considered the different models the authors offered of qualitative driven research that was also mixed method and/or multi-level. My students grappled with the idea of a qualitative research study with multiple levels of qualitative research data--what that might look like, why you might do it, what the pitfalls could be, and how you would manage it.The MMMR community is witnessing a shift from a 'one data set' study structure toward multiple data sets aggregated from a range of structure levels (micro/meso/macro/emanating from a variety of sources (online/offline/mobile/hybrid). (xliv)
In thinking about these issues, the case studies included were invaluable. There are three. The first about rape culture. The second about enhancing the validity of clinical trials with Asian-American patients. The third case study took up gender inequality in the workplace.
Throughout the chapter, the authors used simple visuals (squares inside of or relationship to other squares)--so simple, but very effective.
I appreciated the caveats or cautions the authors offered. Here is one that stood out:
I can't wait to see how the concerns we encountered in the discussion of these articles translate into the future dissertations that will come out of this group.In addition, pursuing a qualitatively driven MMMR design also requires new research skills and resources, and here it behooves researchers to being to question the extent to which they may need to retool their research skills or approach their project with a team of differently skilled researchers (18) [the emphasis is the authors]
The full reference is:
Hesse-Biber, S. & Burke Johnson, R. (Eds.) (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry. Oxford University Press.
Labels:
mixed methods,
multi-methods,
Sharlene Hesse-Biber
Wednesday, October 5, 2016
Reading Deeply: Kindle, Obrist, and Ways of Curating
I have been experimenting, slowly over many months, with the
notes function of Kindle. I wasn’t quite
sure how it would work for me to read full books digitally, to highlight as my
form of taking notes, and to import into other forms. It was all fuzzy for me. I tried out different aspects, moving
carefully, and, interestingly, without reverting to “Google It!” to solve the
problem or give me an overview.
Reading digitally in the kindle is important to me because
the time is already upon us when there may not be a paper form. I was also concerned about the 10% limit on
highlighted sections for export rule.
Would I capture enough for my purposes?
A third concern was, how was I going to keep a sense of the whole, the
chapter structure in which the quotes were embedded?
Obrist’s Ways of
Curating was the first text where I really went to town with the
highlighter and have now imported the notes.
Here are some things I learned.
1.
Go ahead
and save in the html format, because there is an option for editing in Word
2016. It works.
2.
The highlights will be in embedded in the
chapter format—the chapter headings will be there.
3.
You can also highlight the table of contents and
it will save at the beginning (but in a long line of text like a single
sentence).
4.
In the digital version you can see the top
places others have highlighted—I, therefore, didn’t highlight there, but if it
is something you want, go ahead and do it also so you can bring it into your
notes.
5.
Reading the captured highlights is similar and
different to reading the larger text.
It’s like an out-of-body experience.
Reminds me of how people quote/place quotes everywhere today. We are “quote crazy”.
My next possibilities for using this text was to import to
NVivo if I were going to use it in a particular study…and eventually export to
Endnote with the reference. This is
overkill until I have a specific use for it.
In my next blog post I will share selected quotes from the
Obrist reading to give you a sense of what all the quoteness feels like.
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Label and Shame: Donald Trump Illustrates a Common American Trait
[This was an op-ed piece that was not
accepted, which I wrote during the Presidential Primaries shortly after Donald
Trump and Megyn Kelly of Fox News had a well-publicized encounter during a
primary debate. I was connecting the
dots between the research I had done that appeared in Sexting: Gender and Teens
(Sense Publications 2016) and the Donald Trump’s behavior towards women. My thanks to June Lemon of the Center for
Women and Work at UMass Lowell for her editing and suggestions.]
At the first
Republican debate, news reporter Megyn Kelly asked Donald Trump about the names
he had called women in the past, including “fat pigs,
dogs, slobs, and disgusting animals.” His response to Kelly’s question about
negative labels was to shoot back hard
at her, claiming the questions were inappropriate, blaming political
correctness, and later referring to the blood coming out of her eyes and her
wherever.”
I was not
surprised by “the Donald’s” use of what I would term the “label and shame
technique” for controlling women. In a
recent study on teen sexting in which I took part, I discovered that “label and
shame” is alive and well across the United States. If anything, when Donald Trump labels women
with negative and hurtful names and then tries to shame them into the behavior
he wants from them, he is behaving more, rather than less, like most Americans.
In Sexting: Gender and Teens (2014), I
describe both how fear of negative labels and shaming are integral to the way
girls navigate friends and intimates during high school and how other
people — boys and adults — use these
techniques to manipulate them.
In hundreds of
pages of transcribed interviews with teens, caregivers, and educators and
others who work with teens in three different regions of the United States, we
found broad evidence of the application of
negative and demeaning terms like whore, slut, easy, tramp, bus, and
flip to describe a girl who would engage in sexting: the digital exchange of
textual or visual material with sexual content.
On the other
hand, there are no negative terms applied to boys who engage in sexting. Instead boys were considered hapless or
victims of circumstance, perhaps even gaining stature and bragging rights
through involvement in sexting. As
Abraham, a young man, pointed out: “It’s
like a competition with guys.”
Bethany, a high
school age teen in Ohio explained the difference in this way: “I feel …it’s another one of those things
where it’s a …double standard, like if girls have sex with a bunch of dudes,
they’re a ho [whore], but if guys have sex with a bunch of girls, like oh, I
got it in with this girl…then you’re cool, like oh, man, you’re a pimp.”
The shaming of a
girl, according to youth, is done not
only by those closest to her (parental anger and peer rejection and
humiliation), but will also be perpetrated by adults, such as teachers at her
school or the parents of friends who will look down on her and no longer allow
her to continue friendship with their child.
Carolyn (another teenager quoted in the study) stated, “They’re going to
have like a reputation from all the adults that they’re not going to want their
kids hanging out around them because of it.”
Youth attitudes
about gender and sexting are contextualized by adult attitudes. Adults in our study, whether consciously or
unconsciously, consistently pointed to or blamed girls for sexual changes in
our society. Often the rush to blame
girls for social changes are attached to a nostalgic notion of a golden age
when girls knew how to behave. This
quote from a parent sums it up:
It
used to be that the boys were kind of potty mouths, and the girls always needed
to appear prim and proper. Now, what
I’ve seen on Facebook, the girls could make some of those guys blush.
It is galling to
think that despite the many political, legal, and economic changes that have
taken place in regard to women’s rights, women continue to be constrained by
the shaping practices of labelling and shaming.
These negative discourses apply labels such as whore, slut, dog, or fat
pig to women who misbehave. These
negative discourses surround young people with talk about the way girls or
women bear considerable responsibility for the negative changes that have led
toward a more sexual and less moral society.
So as troublesome
as some may find “the Donald’s” label and shame tactics, we may need to look
more closely at our own behavior and at the ways we discuss and discipline boys
and girls in regard to gendered differences.
We also need to show that labelling and shaming has consequences: the
disinvitation of Mr. Trump from a conservative activist conference was a step
in the right direction.
For more information on the book:
For more information on the book:
Saturday, September 24, 2016
Adding Qualitative Research to the Classic Research Design Course
This week I had so much fun at my institution, UMass Lowell! I got to teach the qualitative research component of our classic research design course in the Graduate School of education. I had 10 so-called research newbies in front of me, and it was my job to give them their first real taste of my passion--qualitative research.
Why is this such a big deal, you ask? Well, let me explain. At my institution and at many others around the world, there is an introduction to research course that anchors all the other social science research training, which is supposed to give students a taste of all the possible flavors of research coming up in their doctoral program. Most of these classes, however, are taught by people with deep roots in positivist perspectives, using textbooks that emphasize positive perspectives. I am sorry if this sounds like over simplification to some, but that's what my experience has been. Their interaction with qualitative research has been limited--and they tend to see it as affirming or instrumental, but not as a creative component in and of it own right, nor do they usually have a very complex view of the paradigmatic issues that burden methodological approaches.
However, having launched the Research Methods and Program Evaluation in Education Ph.D. program, our little faculty has been meeting and discussing these issues with real openness...and the result was that my colleague who teaches our Introductory Research Course invited me in to teach the two weeks devoted specifically to qualitative research. Last week was the first week of the two-week experiment.
Selfishly I used it to introduce materials I am developing about the historical beginnings of qualitative research, the chronologies we use to describe its beginnings, and the plethora of research kinds that we now face about a century and a half since those first anthropologists and sociologists were beginning to take lay out the foundations of the field. An interesting exercise I shared was this table of kinds of research taken from the indexes of four qualitative research textbooks on my shelf.
Looks pretty daunting, right? And this is not the sum total of kinds of research one could list--there are many more out there.
My cry to the field is--isn't it about time that we started talking about the principles of qualitative research and started looking at these kinds of research as talking points in an ongoing conversation about those principles?
Onward and upward--I can't wait for next week's class: data collection and analysis and QDAS!
Why is this such a big deal, you ask? Well, let me explain. At my institution and at many others around the world, there is an introduction to research course that anchors all the other social science research training, which is supposed to give students a taste of all the possible flavors of research coming up in their doctoral program. Most of these classes, however, are taught by people with deep roots in positivist perspectives, using textbooks that emphasize positive perspectives. I am sorry if this sounds like over simplification to some, but that's what my experience has been. Their interaction with qualitative research has been limited--and they tend to see it as affirming or instrumental, but not as a creative component in and of it own right, nor do they usually have a very complex view of the paradigmatic issues that burden methodological approaches.
However, having launched the Research Methods and Program Evaluation in Education Ph.D. program, our little faculty has been meeting and discussing these issues with real openness...and the result was that my colleague who teaches our Introductory Research Course invited me in to teach the two weeks devoted specifically to qualitative research. Last week was the first week of the two-week experiment.
Selfishly I used it to introduce materials I am developing about the historical beginnings of qualitative research, the chronologies we use to describe its beginnings, and the plethora of research kinds that we now face about a century and a half since those first anthropologists and sociologists were beginning to take lay out the foundations of the field. An interesting exercise I shared was this table of kinds of research taken from the indexes of four qualitative research textbooks on my shelf.
Research Kinds In
Qualitative Research: J. Davidson Derived from the Indexes of these
texts.
Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation
methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
|
Savin-Baden, M. & Major, C. (2013). Qualitative
research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge:
New York.
|
Hays, D. & Singh, A. (2012).
Qualitative inquiry in clinical
and educational settings. The
Guildford Press: New York.
|
Punch, K. & Oancea, A. (2014) Introduction
to Research methods in Education.
(2nd ed.) Sage Publications.
|
Action Research
Anthropology
Autoethnography
Embodied Ethnography
Case Studies
Collaborative/Participatory Research
Ethnography
Education action research
Empowerment Evaluation
Ethnographic futures research
Applied Ethnography (anthropology)
Narrative Ethnography
Organizational Ethnography
Public Ethnography
Virtual Ethnography
Ethnomethodology
Grounded Theory
Hermeneutics
Indigeneous Research
Interactive Inquiry
Mixed Methods
Narrative Inquiry
Phenomenology
Pragmatic qualitative inquiry
Qualitative inquiry
Symbolic Interactionism
|
Action research
Critical/emancipatory action research
Pragmatic action research
Participatory action research
Anthropology
Arts-based case studies
Arts-informed inquiry
Autoethnography
Case study
Discourse analysis
Feminist theory
Democratic evaluation
Duoethnography
Ethnodrama
Ethnography
Autoethnography
Grounded theory
Hermeneutics
Interpretivism
Life course research
Narrative research
Naturalistic inquiry
Participatory Action Research
Phenomenology
Pragmatic qualitative research
Symbolic interactionism
|
Action Research
Participatory Action Research
Anthropology
Applied Research
Autobiographical case study
Autoethnography
Biographical case study
Case study
Life Histories
Collective case study
Critical theory
Ethnomethodology
Dialectical hermeneutics
Discourse analysis
Ethnography
Femininst research
Grounded theory
Hermeneutics
Mixed methods
Narrative analysis
Narratology
Symbolic Interaction
|
Action research
Critical action research
Participatory action research
Anthropology
Case studies
Critical discourse analysis
Discourse analysis
Ethnography
Grounded theory
Constructivist grounded theory
Mixed methids research
Narrative analysis
Naturalistic research
Phenomenological Analysis
Qualitative research
Symbolic interactionism
|
Looks pretty daunting, right? And this is not the sum total of kinds of research one could list--there are many more out there.
My cry to the field is--isn't it about time that we started talking about the principles of qualitative research and started looking at these kinds of research as talking points in an ongoing conversation about those principles?
Onward and upward--I can't wait for next week's class: data collection and analysis and QDAS!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

